I am answering the question about the play’s crisis and how it marks a turning point:
The play’s crisis is Helmer’s discovery of the letter and his subsequent reaction. As we find out in the final act, it is the one moment that Nora has anticipated ever since she discovered how much trouble she was potentially in for borrowing money by forging her father’s signature. It marks a turning point because it is in that moment that Nora sees her life with a clarity that she seemed not to have possessed previously. She sees her life so clearly, in fact, that her realization spans not only her eight years of marriage but also her previous years living with her father. She finds in that moment that the miracle that she had hoped for did not come true: namely, that Tovlav was not going to try to sacrifice everything for her. It is also, of course, an enlightening moment about the character of Helmer. The thing Tovlav holds most dear was his honor: and he is not willing to give that up for her. In fact, he has kept her from having any honor, happier to treat her like a subordinate being, for their entire marriage. Because Nora now understands her husband’s nature so well, she can see that her role in their marriage is unnatural and unjust. In fact, I believe that Nora’s discovery of her husband’s character in that moment serves as the catalyst for her decision to leave him. In a way it was not even a decision. Because she saw that the only role she could play in a relationship with a man like Tovlav was one of a docile doll and not a person with an identity, Nora realizes that she will never be able to fix her marriage. The fact that she will never be able to fix her marriage shows the readers (or viewers) that Nora is someone who needs to her own identity and be her own person.
Monday, February 23, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
First of all, Mr. Helmer's name is TORVALD--not, as you say, "Tovlav." This confused me to the point where I read the entire play over FOUR times, and didn't find his name once. You owe me 2 hours of my time back, Mr. Zitomer.
Anyways, I would have never thought that the final scene was a catalyst for the play's conclusion; rather, I thought it was more of a climax.
Good analysis.
I like your analysis of Nora's coming into your own a lot! I also like how you focus equally on Torvald instead of spending all your time on Nora. Great blog overall!
Hi Richie!
I like how you discuss the importance of the end of the play and how it really was not a decision for Nora to leave her husband. After Nora learns of Torvald's true character, she knows that she needs to leave and to live her life with independence, confidence, and freedom. I agree that Nora's knowing that she cannot fix her marriage shows us that she needs to move on and to escape her miserable and seemingly inferior lifestyle. Great job in terms of clarity, vocabulary, and organization.
Richie, I love this blog. It was so easy to follow and I completely agree with your analysis of the play's crisis. I think I understand Nora better now that I have read your blog. Reading this blog Nora's abandonment of her husband and family seemed so much more fitting and reasonable than it had before. Again, great job!
Richie
I had never thought that the final scene was a “catalyst” for Nora’s decision to leave Torvald, but now that you explain it that way, I completely agree! I especially liked when you said, “in that moment that Nora sees her life with a clarity that she seemed not to have possessed previously. She sees her life so clearly, in fact, that her realization spans not only her eight years of marriage but also her previous years living with her father.” Truly an excellent analysis of undoubtedly the most important scene in the play!
Richie,
Good blog! Its weird because today in class I was thinking about how the plays main crisis is at the end of the story and not the middle like it usually is. I agree that the turning point of the story is when Helmer sees the letter and I like your point that it not only effects his and Nora's relationship but also the way she looks at all of her past relationships.
It must be a twin thing that I was thinking about this topic today without having discussed it with you at all (considering you never decide to walk across the house to talk to me or remind me about important things like when blog comments are due hence my lateness HINT HINT)
but anyway, way to go bro
ps. i feel like a lot of people in english class are using the word catalyst lately? any particular reason?
Post a Comment